Founders Agreement in India: Vesting, IP and Leaver Terms

Co-founder disputes rarely start with a fight. They start with a gap: nobody wrote down who owns what, what happens if one founder stops working, or who owns the code written before the company existed. A founders agreement fills that gap while everyone still agrees, which is the only time it is cheap to fill.

This note covers what an Indian founders agreement should contain, how vesting and leaver terms work under Indian company and tax law, and why the key terms must also sit in the Articles of Association. It is practical guidance, not legal advice: a lawyer should draft the agreement, and your CA should check the tax points.

What a founders agreement is, and when to sign it

A founders agreement is a contract between the founders, and usually the company, that records the equity split, roles, decision rights, vesting, exit terms and ownership of intellectual property. It differs from the shareholders agreement you sign with investors later, which usually absorbs or replaces it at the first priced round.

The best time to sign is at incorporation, before anyone writes a cheque or a line of production code for the company. Stamp duty on the agreement is a state subject, so check the duty that applies in your state before you sign.

The clauses that decide outcomes

Keep the document short enough that every founder has actually read it. These are the clauses that matter when things go wrong.

An equal split between two founders is common, but it needs a deadlock clause that actually breaks ties, or one disagreement can freeze the board.

• Equity split and the reasoning behind it, including any part-time founder
• Roles, and what happens if a founder does not deliver the role
• Reserved matters that need founder consent, such as issuing shares, taking debt or changing the business
• Deadlock resolution: escalation, a cooling-off period, mediation, then arbitration
• Vesting schedule, cliff, and good leaver and bad leaver definitions
• Assignment of all intellectual property to the company, including work done before incorporation
• Transfer restrictions, such as a right of first refusal among founders

Vesting and reverse vesting under Indian law

Indian law does not give a company a simple right to take a founder's shares back, so Indian founders use reverse vesting. Each founder holds all shares from day one, but unvested shares are subject to a call option in favour of the other founders or a nominee if the founder leaves. Vesting over four years with a one-year cliff is a common market pattern, not a legal rule.

The call option must work in practice. A company buying its own shares is restricted by the buyback rules in section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013, including its limits and solvency conditions, so the usual route is a transfer to the continuing founders or a nominee.

If a founder is a non-resident, the transfer is also a FEMA transaction. Pricing rules apply to transfers between residents and non-residents, so a bad leaver price at face value may be allowed in one direction and not in the other. Check this before you promise a price.

Good leaver, bad leaver and the tax trap

Leaver terms decide the price at which unvested shares move. A common structure: a good leaver, such as a founder who leaves through death, disability or an agreed exit, sells at fair value; a bad leaver, such as a founder removed for fraud or who leaves to join a competitor, sells at cost or face value. Define both terms precisely, and decide whether vested shares are caught too.

Now the tax trap. Under the Income-tax Act, 1961, unquoted shares transferred below fair market value can be taxed on the gap in both hands: section 50CA treats fair value as the seller's sale price, and section 56(2)(x) can tax the buyer on the difference above a small threshold. The Income-tax Act, 2025 replaced the 1961 Act from 1 April 2026 and renumbers these provisions, so check the current section before relying on it. A bad leaver price at face value can therefore create a tax bill nobody planned for, so model it when you draft.

IP assignment: the clause investors check first

Under the Copyright Act, 1957, an employer is the first owner of work made by an employee under a contract of service. Founders are often not employees in that sense, and freelancers and agencies never are. Their code, designs and content stay theirs unless they sign a written assignment, as sections 18 and 19 require. For patents, the company owns an invention only through a contract, so the clause must cover inventions too.

Two drafting points are easy to miss. An assignment that does not state its duration is deemed to last five years, and one that does not state its territory is presumed to cover only India, under section 19, so say perpetual and worldwide. Moral rights stay with the author and cannot be assigned, so the usual approach is a written undertaking not to assert them, though how far that undertaking holds is not settled. Cover pre-incorporation work expressly, because that is the gap due diligence finds.

Non-compete: what Indian courts will and will not enforce

Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 makes an agreement in restraint of trade void, with a narrow exception for the sale of goodwill. Indian courts have generally refused to enforce a non-compete that operates after a person leaves, however reasonable it looks. A restraint while the founder is still with the company is treated differently and is usually upheld.

So do not rely on a post-exit non-compete copied from a US template. Rely on what survives: confidentiality, clean IP assignment, and a bad leaver price that makes leaving to compete expensive. Non-solicitation clauses sit in between, and courts look at each case.

Make the Articles match the agreement

A private company is bound by its Articles of Association. Following the Supreme Court in V.B. Rangaraj v. V.B. Gopalakrishnan, a restriction on share transfer that is not in the Articles does not bind the company. If your vesting call option, right of first refusal and leaver pricing live only in the founders agreement, the company can register a transfer that breaks them.

The fix is simple: amend the Articles to mirror the founders agreement, by special resolution, when you sign. Recheck the fit at every funding round, because the investor shareholders agreement will be written into the Articles too and may override founder terms.

Frequently asked questions

Is a founders agreement legally binding in India?

Yes, if it meets the usual tests of a valid contract under the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and is properly stamped under the applicable state law. Clauses that are void in law, such as a post-exit non-compete, will not be enforced, and share transfer terms bind the company only if they are also in the Articles.

Do we need a founders agreement if we will sign a shareholders agreement with investors?

Yes. The investor shareholders agreement arrives only at the first priced round. Until then the founders agreement is the only document that says what happens if a founder leaves, and investors ask for it in due diligence.

What vesting period is normal for Indian founders?

Four years with a one-year cliff is a common market pattern, not a legal requirement. Some founders get credit for time already worked, and some agreements speed up vesting on a sale of the company. Choose terms you would accept from an investor, because an investor may ask for them anyway.

Can a founder who leaves keep all the shares?

Only if the agreement allows it. With reverse vesting, a leaver keeps vested shares and must transfer unvested shares at the agreed good or bad leaver price. Without an agreement, the leaver usually keeps everything.

Related guides

• Cap table design from day one
• ESOP structuring for Indian startups
• Private limited incorporation in India
• Startup and fundraising advisory services